Casey Stoner Critiques Anti-Highside Aid at the Austrian Grand Prix

Two-time MotoGP world champion Casey Stoner has expressed strong opposition to the introduction of anti-highside technology being implemented at the Austrian Grand Prix. His remarks came after the first free practice session at the Red Bull Ring, coinciding with similar criticisms from competitors Marc Marquez and Pedro Acosta the previous day.

Stoner’s Concerns About Racing Technology

Stoner’s perspective on the stability control system, officially termed the anti-highside aid, reflects a deep concern for the direction in which motorcycle racing is headed. He articulated that this technological advancement is symptomatic of larger issues within motorsport, particularly drawing parallels with historical missteps in Formula 1.

"At this point, we seem to be creating champions out of engineers rather than riders," Stoner stated. "We’re entering a phase reminiscent of the mistakes Formula 1 made in the past. Despite a plethora of past examples showing these systems don’t function as intended, we’re still choosing to follow in the footsteps of every problem Formula 1 has managed to eliminate over the years."

Stoner pointed out that the introduction of advanced electronics has reached levels that he finds concerning. "This weekend introduced a whole new layer of electronics. From discussions with other riders, it’s evident that you can twist the throttle without any immediate response, despite having nearly 300 horsepower at your disposal."

He emphasized that the elite riders in MotoGP are now piloting some of the easiest bikes to handle, which detracts from the essence of the sport. "I find this shift unappealing," he remarked. "The thrill of racing seems diminished when you can simply twist the throttle and rely on technology."

The Impact of Technology on Rider Skill

Stoner elaborated on how the current technology removes the critical element of skill involved in riding. He recounted his own experiences during testing, where he was restricted from using the clutch effectively while entering corners, as it interfered with the electronic systems. "This eradicates the skill component; it’s reduced to braking hard, entering the corner, and then relying on a button to manage the rest," he lamented. "There’s just an overwhelming amount of technology at play."

He remained skeptical of the official narrative that the stability control system was a measure to enhance safety. "I don’t see it as a safety improvement," he argued. "By diminishing the rider’s control over the bike’s rear, you eliminate the fear factor that comes with riding. This can lead to riders pushing their limits even more, particularly concerning the front end. If a rider loses control of the front, the bike can rebound onto the track, which can lead to severe accidents."

Stoner highlighted the paradoxical nature of making the rear of the bike safer while potentially increasing risks associated with the front end. "The more secure the rear becomes, the greater the risks on the front. We could end up witnessing more severe incidents as a result."

Performance Challenges in Practice Sessions

Stoner’s assertions were echoed during a subsequent practice session, where, although there were no high-side crashes, several riders struggled with their braking techniques, leading to off-track excursions. One notable example was Enea Bastianini, who experienced multiple incidents during the session.

While braking has consistently posed challenges on the Spielberg track, it became evident that the top riders in the session—those advancing directly to Q2—managed to navigate these difficulties more effectively, showcasing the importance of skill even amidst advanced technology.

Future Regulations and Their Implications

Looking ahead, Stoner voiced his apprehensions regarding the planned adjustments for MotoGP in 2027, which include reductions in aerodynamics and engine capacity, along with a ban on ride-height devices. When asked if he believed the upcoming regulations would adequately address current issues, Stoner responded with skepticism. "Not even close. Making the bikes lighter shortens braking distances and can ultimately reduce top speed due to the absence of ride-height devices. Consequently, this change leads to shorter braking points and fewer overtaking opportunities."

He further explained the ongoing challenges with aerodynamics, noting that winglets would still play a role, potentially allowing for higher cornering speeds. "This will create turbulent air dynamics on a lighter bike, which can lead to instability and complications with tire temperatures," he added.

Stoner also emphasized the financial implications of aerodynamics in the sport. "Not too long ago, MotoGP was grappling with cost issues, attempting to find ways to cut expenses. Investing in aerodynamics only complicates this situation, as it represents one of the most expensive aspects of motorcycle racing."

The Bigger Picture in MotoGP

Stoner’s critique underscores a broader conversation within the world of MotoGP, where the balance between technology and the raw skill of the rider is increasingly under scrutiny. His comments reflect a desire to return to a focus on the rider’s abilities rather than an overreliance on technological aids that may detract from the sport’s authenticity.

He concluded his thoughts with a sense of urgency, expressing disbelief that the governing bodies of the sport are failing to recognize the potential pitfalls ahead. "Every step taken in this direction seems to lead us further away from what makes motorcycle racing truly compelling," he said.

In summary, Casey Stoner’s strong opposition to the anti-highside technology introduced at the Austrian Grand Prix highlights critical concerns about the evolving landscape of MotoGP. His insights into the implications of advanced electronic systems, the diminishing role of rider skill, and the potential risks introduced by new regulations serve as a call for reflection within the sport. As MotoGP continues to navigate the balance between innovation and tradition, Stoner’s perspective may resonate with many who cherish the thrill and skill that define motorcycle racing.